Amateur Grade?

4:20 pm August 27th, 2008

Maybe it’s just the effects of “airport fatigue,” but after staring at some photo magazines during a mind-numbing wait at the terminal, something occurred to me. At least half the content in these publications seems to come from non-pros. This ratio is significantly greater on the Internet where an incredible volume of spectacular work from amateurs is posted every single day. Purely professional venues, on the other hand, don’t always emphasize image quality or artistic intent. A quick scan of some forums and article shows that many users of high-end gear don’t use it professionally. Why is it, then, that marketing departments (and even common vernacular) refers to it as “pro”-grade?

I am certainly not privy to sales data from any of the major manufacturers, but I do wonder. So-called “serious amateurs” appear to make a significant part of the market for top-of-the-line equipment, yet it seems practically all marketing effort is aimed at professionals. New products are announced at trade shows, not generally attended by  non-pros. Marketing literature seems to emphasize professional use. Discounts and other incentives are generally offered to pros-only

Given my purely empirical survey of photography magazines and Internet forums, I do wonder; are the marketing execs for major manufacturers missing something obvious? Should high-end equipment be targeted at non-pros?

Who is more likely to purchase an expensive piece of gear? a well-to-do amateur photographer with a passionate hobby, or a professional photographer looking to minimize their business expenses?

Just wondering…

The Proverbial “Body of Work” and The Narrow-Minded Art Critic

9:00 pm August 5th, 2008

dc000611.jpg

Is the person eloquent in one language necessarily a better communicator than one who masters several? Is the person who specializes in playing the violin necessarily a better musician than one who can also play the piano and the clarinet?

Why is it, when art critics have nothing more constructive to say, they always fall back on the tired old “lack of focus” to the detriment of an artist’s body of work? And, more perplexing, why is such criticism never questioned and is so readily acceptable as inalienable truth?

If lack of focus was any kind of measure for the worth of an artist or their body of work, Leonardo Da Vinci would not make the cut. Neither would Michelangelo, Rafael, Beethoven, or Mozart. Edward Weston gets an “F” for photographing everything from nudes through bell peppers to dead pelicans. Ansel Adams should be relegated to amateur status for photographing just about anything with interesting tonality, not to mention being a pianist to boot.

When a critic tells you your work lacks focus, he is really telling you one of two things: A) he has a financial interest in selling  art (collectors prize consistency, not always personal expression), or B) he didn’t take the time to understand the roots of your art.

The former is pretty straightforward, so let me elaborate on the latter. Consider the “body of work” metaphor: your fingers, your eyes, and your hair are parts of the same body, but appear completely different. The commonality is not in the shape, size, color, or any other immediately-discernible characteristic. Yet, they are all the product of the same genetic blueprint - the same DNA that makes them parts of one unique  whole body. It is thus with art: the common roots of an artistic body of work are the sensibilities of the artist. The same artist can produce a color image of one subject, a B&W image of another, a wood carving, and a poem describing their morning walk, and still have all of them be one consistent body of work - consistent in the sense that all are coming from the same place, emanating from the same creative nucleus, and representing the same vision and ideas. Anyone who fails to see the focus is simply not looking hard enough.

A sad consequence of such narrow-minded criticism is that many would-be multi-talented artists end up crippling their own creative avenues under the dictum that they need “more focus”.

Can you imagine Beethoven avoiding symphonies because he was “just a concerto composer” or because he needed to focus on string quartets? How about Michelangelo refusing to paint the Sistine Chapel because he was focusing on sculptures, or Picasso never becoming a Cubist because he was forever focused and stuck in his Blue Period?

Come on, critics, do you honestly want to limit the growth of artists and to lock them into a repetitive, narrowly-focused churn for the rest of their careers? Give up this silly notion of looking for obvious similarities and dig deeper: look for the soul of an artist, not for their sales potential! Don’t be in the way of artists evolving and exploring and discovering! It’s time to let go of the old “lack of focus” crutch. It is not self-evident truth and, more often than not, is neither helpful to the artist nor to the art. How many artists came home depressed and defeated from a review after hearing such a blunt missive? How many of those may end up giving up on experimentation and discovering their true calling because of it? If there is even one such person - you are guilty; guilty of not giving them due consideration, and maybe guilty of hindering their growth or even the growth of art itself. Can you say with confidence that it wasn’t you who failed to see the proverbial DNA underlying a true and diverse body of work? Have you truly and honestly looked hard enough before dismissing a portfolio with a failsafe excuse?

Artists - look inside yourselves, pick whatever form of expression feels right. As long as you’re true to your own calling, your work - whatever it is, and in whatever media - will never lack focus. The focal point is YOU.

Guy

Made it Through Another Year

8:32 pm August 3rd, 2008

Red Castle Dusk

I spent the last three days backpacking in the Uinta Mountains, celebrating my birthday in the beautiful alpine basins below Red Castle Mountain, in the company of Dave Fantle and Steve Weaver.

More to come… as soon as I’ve had a chance to catch up.

Guy

EXIF and Beyond Podcast

6:00 am July 28th, 2008

I recently had the pleasure of spending some time with Jim Goldtsein, hiking and talking photography. Jim is the owner of the EXIF and Beyond podcast, as well as a prolific and insightful blogger with a special knack for discssing pertinent issues on art and photography that many of us struggle with. I wholeheartedly recommend his blog.  My interview with him is now featured on the EXIF and Beyond podcast.

Guy

Morning at the Butte

8:08 pm July 25th, 2008

Morning at Factory Butte

Back from another stay at my little slice of heaven in Torrey, UT. And now, the mountains are calling. No rest for the wicked!

Another image and some photo tips can be seen at the Mountain Trail Photo Blog.

Guy

Interview on Suprada Urval’s Photoblog

7:44 pm July 7th, 2008

I’m happy to be the subject of the latest Photo Talk interview on Suprada Urval’s photoblog. Suprada asked some very interesting questions, which I greatly enjoyed thinking about.

Guy

Announcing Mountain Trail Photography Site and Blog

8:41 am June 29th, 2008

Mountain Trail Photography LogoI am pleased to announce that I have joined the talented and creative team at Mountain Trail Photography. Our newly-launched site offers a great selection of articles, images, tips, workshops, and more than anything: inspiration.

Please be sure to visit our web site, and watch our blog for updates, trip stories, and tips.

Hope to see you there!

Guy

Back in the Groove

8:34 am June 29th, 2008

Back home after an extended business trip and boy, it’s good to see mountains again! The passes are open, the wildflowers are beginning to show, and exciting things are in the works.

For those of you yet to subscribe to my newsletter, please note  you can now subscribe directly online. Just point your web browser to our new mailing list manager:

 Guy Tal Photography Newsletter

As always, I will never share, sell, or otherwise use your contact information for anything other than my own newsletters and the occasional promotion and you may unsubscribe with a single click at any time.

Guy

New Images Posted

6:26 pm May 29th, 2008

Some new images from the recent trip are now available:

 New Images Gallery

Guy

Escalante Private Tour

8:43 pm May 28th, 2008

Memorial Day weekend brought about some very interesting weather to Southern Utah and the Colorado Plateau. I had the pleasure of guiding Arkansas photographer Ed Cooley around the Escalante region for 3 days of wonderful light, desert wildflowers, and dramatic skies.

Better yet, Ed was kind enough to post some images from the trip on his blog (including one of yours truly):

http://natureartphoto.com/blog/?p=208

http://natureartphoto.com/blog/?p=221

http://natureartphoto.com/blog/?p=223

Thanks for a great time, Ed!

Guy